• ACTIVATE DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • |
  • SIGN IN
Sign In

If this is your first time visiting our new website with your previous account, please reset your password to regain access.

Forgot your password?

Having trouble? Email us at webhelp@secularhumanism.org

Center for Inquiry logo Richard Dawkins Foundation Skeptical Inquirer logo Free Inquiry logo

Your account now works on all of our websites.

MENU
  • Our Latest Issue
  • Archive
  • All Articles
  • Submit an Article
  • Update Subscription Info
  • Join a Group
  • Join Our Email Newsletter
  • Secular Humanism
    What Is Secular Humanism? Secular Humanism Defined A Secular Humanist Declaration Affirmations of Humanism
  • Ingersoll Museum
    About Hours & Contact Ingersoll Biography Ingersoll Chronology Audio Recordings Annual Newsletter Become a Friend of the Museum
  • Contact Us
  • Forums
  • Store
  • Donate

Author: Russell Blackford

Russell Blackford is a conjoint senior lecturer in philosophy at the University of Newcastle (Australia) and a regular columnist for Free Inquiry. His latest book, The Tyranny of Opinion: Conformity and the Future of Liberalism (2019), is published by Bloomsbury Academic.

Op-Ed
Should We Abolish Morality?
Free Inquiry Volume 33, No. 3
April / May 2013
Russell Blackford

Should We Abolish Morality? Prominent philosopher Joel Marks has published a new book on the topic of moral skepticism: Ethics without Morals: In Defense of Amorality (Routledge, 2013). Marks was formerly a moral realist with essentially Kantian intuitions, but in recent times he has had something of a (de)conversion experience, coming to the view that …

This article is available to subscribers only.
Subscribe now or log in to read this article.

Op-Ed
The Fascination of Faitheism
Free Inquiry Volume 33, No. 2
February / March 2013
Russell Blackford

In his new book, Faitheist: How an Atheist Found Common Ground with the Religious (Beacon, 2012), Chris Stedman asks for kinder, gentler expressions of atheism. For Stedman, the current level of hostility among atheists toward religion and religious people is not only uncomfortable but also, more important, counterproductive to the achievement of shared humane goals. …

This article is available to subscribers only.
Subscribe now or log in to read this article.

Op-Ed
Up With Secularism!
Free Inquiry Volume 32, No. 6
October / November 2012
Russell Blackford

As I write, the latest issue of New Humanist (July/August 2012), the magazine of the United Kingdom’s Rationalist Association, has come out with an article by Richard Smyth titled “Down With Secularism.” Smyth thoroughly rejects ideas of a separation of church and state, or as we might rephrase it, of keeping religion out of government …

This article is available to subscribers only.
Subscribe now or log in to read this article.

Op-Ed
The State and the Marriage Business
Free Inquiry Volume 32, No. 5
August / September 2012
Russell Blackford

Here in Australia, as in many other parts of the world, there is an ongoing public debate about proposals to extend marriage to same-sex couples. As marriage falls within the federal jurisdiction under the Australian Constitution, this has led to public consultation processes involving the federal houses of Parliament (the House of Representatives and the …

This article is available to subscribers only.
Subscribe now or log in to read this article.

Op-Ed
Who’s Afraid of Scientism?
Free Inquiry Volume 32, No. 3
April / May 2012
Russell Blackford

One fashionable criticism of outspoken atheists is that we demonstrate the vice of scientism—whatever that is exactly. This criticism comes from many theologians, such as John Haught, but also from some secular philosophers. The critics seldom define scientism, and I doubt that they can agree on a definition. Is it skepticism about specifically religious “ways …

This article is available to subscribers only.
Subscribe now or log in to read this article.

Transforming Humanity: Fantasy? Dream? Nightmare?
Enhancement Anxiety
Free Inquiry Volume 32, No. 1
December 2011 / January 2012
Russell Blackford

A problem with the current debates about emerging technologies is that they really are debates—plural. Reasonable policy approaches to embryonic sex selection, for example, or to human reproductive cloning, if it were available, might not generalize to more radical technologies that could reverse the aging process, dramatically increase our cognitive capacities, alter the gross morphology …

This article is available to subscribers only.
Subscribe now or log in to read this article.

  • «
  • 1
  • 2

is a magazine published by the Center for Inquiry

Quick Links


    • Home
    • Our Latest Issue
    • What is Secular Humanism?
    • About the Council for Secular Humanism
    • Forkosch Awards
    • Activate Digital Subscription
    • Update Subscription Information
    • Join Our Email Newsletter
    • Advertise in Free Inquiry
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donate
FOLLOW US

is a magazine published by the Center for Inquiry



Free Inquiry Magazine

PO Box 664
Amherst, NY 14226
800-458-1366 or (716) 636-7571

Center for Inquiry – Headquarters

PO Box 741
Amherst, NY 14226
(716) 636-4869

Terms · Privacy Statement
Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2022 · All Rights Reserved.
Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 22-2306795

Notifications